Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Bill, 2025

Subject: Clause 40 — New Chapter IV-A: Creditor-Initiated Insolvency Resolution Process (Sections 58A to 58K) — Analysis of Proposed Sections and Cross-Reference Verification

Reference: Bill No. 107 of 2025 (as introduced in Lok Sabha)

Introduced by: Smt. Nirmala Sitharaman, Minister of Finance and Corporate Affairs, 12th August, 2025

I. Overview and Legislative Context

Clause 40 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Bill, 2025 ("Bill") omits the existing Chapter IV of Part II of the principal Act (Fast Track Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, comprising sections 55 to 58) and substitutes in its place an entirely new Chapter IV-A titled "Creditor-Initiated Insolvency Resolution Process" ("CIRP-CI"). This is achieved by inserting eleven new sections - sections 58A through 58K - into Part II of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 ("IBC" or "Code").

The substitution is not merely cosmetic. The CIRP-CI is a structurally novel mechanism that departs fundamentally from the court-centric architecture of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process ("CIRP") under Chapter II and the Pre-Packaged Insolvency Resolution Process ("PPIRP") under Chapter III-A. The Statement of Objects and Reasons describes it as an out-of-court initiation mechanism designed for genuine business failures to facilitate faster, more cost-effective insolvency resolution with minimal business disruption."

This Note examines: (i) the structure and purpose of each of the eleven new sections; (ii) the cross-references to existing provisions of the IBC embedded in those sections; and (iii) any gaps, discrepancies, or observations arising from a verification of those cross-references against the Bill text.

II. Significance of Clause 40: Entirely New Provisions

It is important to appreciate that all eleven sections introduced by Clause 40 — sections 58A to 58K — are entirely new provisions. They do not amend or substitute any existing provision of the IBC other than Chapter IV as a whole (which is separately omitted by Clause 39). The significance of this insertion is threefold:

• New process architecture: CIRP-CI creates a third pathway for corporate insolvency resolution in India alongside CIRP and PPIRP. It is the first process under the IBC that commences entirely outside the NCLT, by the unilateral act of a creditor.

• New regulatory paradigm: The process introduces mechanisms not found elsewhere in the IBC — including an optional moratorium, a creditor veto right (rather than management supersession), RP attendance at Board meetings with a resolution rejection right, and mandatory conversion (rather than liquidation) as the escalation step.

• Substantial delegated legislation: Nearly every material condition and procedural requirement under sections 58A to 58K is to be specified by Central Government rules or IBBI regulations. The new provisions therefore create a broad enabling framework, the operational content of which will be determined subsequently.

III. Section-by-Section Analysis of Chapter IV-A

A. Section 58A — Eligible Corporate Debtors

Section 58A defines the category of corporate debtors eligible for CIRP-CI. Under sub-section (1), eligibility is determined by Central Government notification across three bases: (a) asset or income thresholds; (b) class of creditors or quantum of debt; or (c) any other category.

Sub-section (2) imposes negative eligibility conditions. A corporate debtor is ineligible if an insolvency resolution or liquidation proceeding is already ongoing under Part II, or if it has undergone a CIRP-CI, PPIRP, or completed a CIRP within the three years preceding the CIRP-CI commencement date.

Observation: The three-year bar mirrors the language of section 54A(2)(a) for PPIRP. The exclusion of ongoing CIRP/liquidation prevents duplicative or overlapping proceedings — consistent with section 58B(5), which bars fresh applications during a CIRP-CI period.

B. Section 58B — Initiation Procedure

Section 58B is the operative core of the CIRP-CI. It creates a multi-step pre-commencement protocol:

1. The initiating financial creditor must belong to a class of financial institutions notified by the Central Government. The minimum default threshold under section 4 must be satisfied.

2. Before appointing a resolution professional, the financial creditor must: (a) obtain 51% approval in value from the notified class of financial creditors; (b) give the corporate debtor at least 30 days to make a representation; and (c) after considering any representation, obtain fresh 51% approval within 30 days.

3. If the creditor fails to obtain fresh approval within 30 days, it must restart the process under sub-section (2)(a).

4. Once all requirements of sub-section (2) are met, the financial creditor may immediately appoint a resolution professional (with no pending disciplinary proceedings).

5. The RP makes a public announcement of the initiation and communicates to the NCLT and IBBI along with a compliance report. The CIRP-CI is deemed commenced from the date of the public announcement — no court order is required.

Observation: The out-of-court commencement is a radical departure from the IBC's existing architecture. The compliance report submitted by the RP at the point of commencement (confirming that sections 58A and 58B have been satisfied) serves as an accountability mechanism in the absence of judicial scrutiny at admission. The 30-day representation window to the corporate debtor is also novel — it is an ex ante right not available to the debtor at the admission stage under section 7.

C. Section 58C — Objection by Corporate Debtor

Section 58C provides the corporate debtor a post-commencement objection mechanism before the NCLT within 30 days. The NCLT's jurisdiction is limited to two determinations:

• If no default has occurred (or if there is both no default and a procedural violation) — it may declare the commencement void ab initio.

• If default is established but initiation was procedurally deficient — it must convert the process to CIRP under section 58H(1), not void it.

Observation: The NCLT cannot, on an objection, simply dismiss or terminate the CIRP-CI if default exists. Where default is found, conversion to CIRP is mandatory even if there has been material non-compliance under section 58B. This prevents the corporate debtor from using procedural objections as a delay tactic to escape all insolvency proceedings. The NCLT must pass the order within 30 days, failing which it must record reasons for delay.

D. Section 58D — Period for Completion

The CIRP-CI must be completed within 150 days from the commencement date. A single extension of up to 45 days may be granted by the NCLT on an application by the RP with 66% CoC approval. No further extension is permitted.

If the CoC does not approve a resolution plan within the stipulated (or extended) period, the NCLT must pass a conversion order under section 58H(1).

Observation: The combined maximum period of 195 days is shorter than the CIRP's outer limit of 330 days. The consequence for failure is conversion to CIRP (a more intensive but still insolvency-positive outcome) rather than immediate liquidation, reflecting the Bill's preference for value preservation.

E. Section 58E — Duties and Powers of RP

The RP's role during CIRP-CI is bounded and non-managerial. The duties specified in sub-section (1) include:

• Calling for submission of claims;

• Preparing the information memorandum;

• Preparing a compliance report on whether the process and the resolution plan conform to the procedural requirements under sections 29A and 30;

• Performing duties under sections 18(a)–(c) and 25(2)(e)–(j) (borrowed mutatis mutandis);

• Exercising powers under sections 54F(3)–(4) (borrowed mutatis mutandis);

• Filing reports and documents with the IBBI; and

• Performing any other duties specified by IBBI.

Sub-section (2) applies sections 19(2)–(3) to the CIRP-CI, requiring persons associated with the corporate debtor to extend assistance and cooperation to the RP.

Observation: Notably, section 18(d)–(g) (which deal with constituting the CoC and related IRP functions) is not incorporated by reference — correctly so, as they relate to IRP-specific functions in CIRP that are inapplicable to the CIRP-CI architecture where no IRP is appointed.

F. Section 58F — Management and Cooperation

Management of the corporate debtor vests with its Board of Directors or partners throughout the CIRP-CI period. This is the most fundamental structural distinction from CIRP.

Sub-section (2) grants the RP a right to attend all Board/partner meetings and reject any resolution passed thereat. A rejected resolution is deemed not approved. Sub-section (3) imposes liability on promoters and personnel for omissions or false information in the information memorandum, with sections 54G(2)–(4) and 77A applied mutatis mutandis.

Observation: The RP's veto/rejection right over Board resolutions is an entirely novel mechanism in Indian insolvency law — creating a supervisory power short of managerial supersession. This is carefully calibrated: the RP can prevent value-destructive decisions without taking on management liability. The IBBI will specify the conditions and manner for exercising this right, which will be critical to prevent overreach or paralysis of the corporate debtor's operations.

G. Section 58G — Optional Moratorium

Unlike CIRP (where moratorium is automatic), the CIRP-CI moratorium is optional and discretionary. The RP must apply to the NCLT for a moratorium (with the scope of section 14(1) read with section 14(3)) after obtaining CoC approval (or 51% financial creditor approval if CoC is not yet constituted).

The moratorium commences from the date of the application and continues through the CIRP-CI period. The NCLT may confirm or reject the application. The RP must publicly announce both the filing of the application and any rejection.

Observation: The architecture is deliberate — management continuity with an optional moratorium allows commercially viable debtors to continue operations without the reputational and operational disruption of an automatic moratorium. The NCLT's confirmatory role limits potential misuse. Once confirmed, the NCLT cannot be approached to lift or modify the moratorium during the CIRP-CI period.

H. Section 58H — Conversion to CIRP

Section 58H provides for conversion of CIRP-CI to CIRP under Chapter II in three situations: (a) no resolution plan received within the section 58D period; (b) the corporate debtor/its personnel fail to cooperate with the RP; and (c) rejection of the resolution plan under section 58J read with section 31(2). The CoC may also voluntarily convert by a 66% vote.

The conversion order under sub-section (1) must simultaneously: (i) convert the process; (ii) decide the stage from which CIRP commences; (iii) appoint the CIRP-CI RP as IRP/RP for CIRP; (iv) declare a moratorium under section 14; and (v) include CIRP-CI costs as insolvency resolution process costs.

Sub-section (3) deems the conversion order as an admission order under section 7 and provides that: avoidance proceedings carry over; and the look-back periods for sections 43, 46, and 50 run from the CIRP-CI commencement date to the insolvency commencement date.

Observation: The deemed admission under section 7 is a well-considered legal fiction that ensures continuity of proceedings and avoids re-litigation of the existence of default. The carry-over of avoidance transaction proceedings and the extended look-back period (from CIRP-CI commencement) close a potential window for pre-initiation asset stripping.

I. Section 58-I — Withdrawal

Withdrawal of the CIRP-CI public announcement requires 90% CoC voting share approval and NCLT sanction on an application by the RP. The NCLT must pass the withdrawal order within 14 days (record reasons if delayed). Withdrawal is prohibited before CoC constitution and after the first invitation for submission of a resolution plan.

Observation: The 90% threshold is identical to section 12A (CIRP withdrawal as amended). However, the NCLT's timeline for passing the order is 14 days here, compared to 30 days under section 12A — a tighter window that reflects the CIRP-CI's emphasis on speed. This difference was not flagged in the Statement of Objects and Reasons but is evident from a direct comparison of the two provisions.

J. Section 58J — Approval of Resolution Plan

Where the CoC approves a resolution plan by 66% vote, the RP submits it to the NCLT along with the compliance report prepared under section 58E(1)(c). The NCLT applies section 31 (CIRP approval framework) mutatis mutandis, with limited jurisdiction to verify procedural compliance.

Observation: The compliance report filed alongside the resolution plan is a CIRP-CI-specific addition that does not have a counterpart in CIRP. It serves as a substitute for the NCLT's admission-stage scrutiny that was bypassed at commencement. The approved resolution plan will have all the effects of a section 31 approval, including the newly inserted clean-slate principle under sections 31(5) and (6) (introduced by Clause 19).

K. Section 58K — Application of Part II Provisions

Section 58K applies a list of existing Part II provisions to the CIRP-CI mutatis mutandis, with four definitional substitutions:

• "Corporate insolvency resolution process" → "creditor-initiated insolvency resolution process"

• "Insolvency commencement date" → "creditor-initiated insolvency commencement date"

• "Insolvency resolution process period" → "creditor-initiated insolvency resolution process period"

• For sections 43, 46, and 50: the look-back period is measured from the "creditor-initiated insolvency commencement date" (not the "initiation date")

The provisions applied include: sections 21, 24, 25A, 26, 27, 28, 28A, 29, 32, 32A, 43–51, and Chapters VI and VII of Part II.

Observation: The fourth definitional modification under sub-section (1)(d) is significant and easily overlooked. By substituting the look-back period anchor to the CIRP-CI commencement date (rather than the "initiation date" used for CIRP under the amended sections 43, 46, and 50), the Bill ensures that the CIRP-CI does not offer a shorter look-back window than CIRP — preventing sophisticated debtors from preferring CIRP-CI as a strategy to limit transaction avoidance exposure.

IV. Cross-Reference Verification: Clause 40

The following table sets out each significant cross-reference embedded in sections 58A to 58K, the result of verification against the Bill text, and observations arising therefrom.

Section	Cross-Reference(s)	Status	Observation
Section 58A	Sections 58B, 54A(2), Part II generally	✓ Verified	Eligibility criteria directly mirror structure of section 54A for pre-packaged process. The three-year exclusion period under sub-section (2)(b) is consistent with section 54A(2)(a).
Section 58B(1)	Section 4 (default threshold); notified class of financial institutions	✓ Verified	Minimum default threshold of section 4 must be satisfied; only notified financial institutions (a sub-class of financial creditors under section 5(7)) may initiate. No reference error found.
Section 58B(2)(a)–(c)	Section 21 (CoC voting), section 7 (admission comparison)	✓ Verified	The 51% pre-initiation approval threshold is distinct from CoC's 66% threshold under section 21. The Bill is internally consistent — this is a pre-commencement creditor consensus mechanism.
Section 58B(4)	Section 13, 15 (public announcement analogy)	✓ Verified	Public announcement by RP under section 58B(4) is the functional equivalent of the public announcement under sections 13/15 for CIRP, but made out-of-court. Commencement is date of announcement, not NCLT order.
Section 58B(5)	Sections 7, 9, 10, 54C	✓ Verified	Explicitly bars filing of applications under sections 7, 9, 10, and 54C during the CIRP-CI period — correctly cross-referenced in the Bill text.
Section 58C(2)(b)	Section 58H(1)	✓ Verified	On procedural violation with default established, conversion to CIRP under section 58H(1) is correctly cross-referenced. The NCLT passes conversion order under sub-clauses (i)–(v) of section 58H(1).
Section 58D(3)	Section 58H(1)	✓ Verified	Failure to receive resolution plan within timeline mandates NCLT order under section 58H(1). Cross-reference is accurate.
Section 58E(1)(d)	Sections 18(a)–(c), 25(2)(e)–(j)	✓ Verified	Duties of RP during CIRP-CI borrow from sections 18 (IRP duties) and 25 (RP duties) of CIRP. Mutatis mutandis application is apt; however, section 18(d)–(g) is not listed — deliberate, as those pertain to IRP-specific functions not applicable to CIRP-CI.
Section 58E(1)(e)	Section 54F(3)–(4)	✓ Verified	Powers of RP under PPIRP (section 54F) applied to CIRP-CI. Appropriate as both processes retain management with the debtor during the process.
Section 58F(1)	Section 54H (PPIRP management)	✓ Verified	Section 54H on management during pre-packaged process applied mutatis mutandis. Consistent with the philosophy of management continuity in CIRP-CI.
Section 58F(3)	Sections 54G(2)–(4), 77A	✓ Verified	Liability for misleading information in IM under PPIRP (section 54G) and penalties under section 77A apply to CIRP-CI. Cross-references are accurate.
Section 58G(1)	Section 14(1) read with 14(3)	✓ Verified	Moratorium scope correctly references section 14(1) (general moratorium) qualified by section 14(3) (exceptions). Since management stays with debtor, moratorium is optional and requires NCLT confirmation — a deliberate structural departure from CIRP.
Section 58H(1)(c)	Section 58J read with section 31(2)	✓ Verified	Conversion triggered by rejection of resolution plan under section 58J (which applies section 31 mutatis mutandis). Chain of cross-references is traceable and correct.
Section 58H(3)(c)	Sections 43, 46, 50 (look-back periods)	✓ Verified	On conversion, look-back periods for preferential (s.43), undervalued (s.46), and extortionate credit (s.50) transactions are measured from the CIRP-CI commencement date. Consistent with amended sections 43, 46, 50 in Clauses 26, 27, 30.
Section 58H(3)(b)	Section 7 (deemed admission)	✓ Verified	Conversion order is deemed an admission order under section 7; the initiating financial creditor is treated as the applicant. This is a legal fiction enabling seamless transition to CIRP.
Section 58-I(1)	Section 12A (withdrawal analogy)	~ Partial	Withdrawal requires 90% CoC voting share — identical to section 12A as amended. However, the timeline for NCLT order under section 58-I(3) is 14 days, whereas section 12A provides 30 days. The difference was not flagged in the summary but is verified in the Bill.
Section 58J(1)	Section 30 (resolution plan requirements), section 29A (eligibility)	✓ Verified	Resolution plan must comply with section 30 (including dissenting creditor protections as amended) and section 29A (applicant eligibility). Cross-references confirmed in section 58E(1)(c) compliance report.
Section 58J(2)	Section 31 (approval framework)	✓ Verified	Approval by NCLT follows section 31 mutatis mutandis, including the clean-slate principle newly inserted by Clause 19 (sections 31(5)–(6)). The NCLT's limited jurisdiction is consistent with its role under CIRP.
Section 58K(1)	Sections 21, 24, 25A, 26, 27, 28, 28A, 29, 32, 32A, 43–51, Chapters VI, VII	~ Partial	The list of applicable provisions is comprehensive. Sub-section 58K(1)(d) modifies the look-back period for sections 43, 46, 50 — an important carve-out absent from the earlier summary but correctly stated in the Bill.
Section 58K(2)	Board regulations (IBBI)	✓ Verified	IBBI empowered to specify conditions and procedural requirements for CIRP-CI — consistent with its general regulatory powers under section 196.

V. Summary: New Sections 58A–58K at a Glance

The following table summarises each of the eleven new sections, their purpose, and the key ways in which they depart from the existing CIRP framework.

Section	Title	Purpose	Key Departures from CIRP
Section 58A	Eligible Corporate Debtors	Defines the universe of corporate debtors eligible for CIRP-CI by Central Government notification, based on size, creditor class, or debt quantum. Also sets negative eligibility criteria.	Does not prescribe eligibility directly — delegates entirely to Central Government notification, unlike CIRP where any corporate debtor above the section 4 threshold is eligible.
Section 58B	Initiation of CIRP-CI	Establishes the out-of-court commencement mechanism: notified financial creditors initiate by obtaining 51% creditor approval, giving the debtor a 30-day representation window, obtaining fresh 51% approval, and appointing a RP who makes a public announcement.	No application to NCLT for commencement; process commences by RP's public announcement. Corporate debtor is informed and given representation rights before initiation. No IRP — RP is directly appointed by the creditor.
Section 58C	Objection by Corporate Debtor	Allows the corporate debtor to challenge commencement before NCLT within 30 days. NCLT may either void the process (no default) or convert it to CIRP (default with procedural non-compliance).	Challenge is post-commencement (reactive) unlike CIRP where the debtor can oppose admission before the NCLT. NCLT cannot simply dismiss — must either void or convert.
Section 58D	Period for Completion	Sets a 150-day timeline with a single 45-day extension (requiring 66% CoC approval). Failure to approve a resolution plan triggers mandatory conversion to CIRP.	Shorter base period than CIRP (180 days + 90-day extension). Non-compliance leads to conversion, not liquidation — a more graduated escalation.
Section 58E	Duties and Powers of RP	Lists duties of RP during CIRP-CI: calling claims, preparing IM, compliance report on process and plan, filing with IBBI. Borrows several duties from sections 18 and 25 mutatis mutandis.	RP's role is primarily supervisory and compliance-focused — not managerial. RP does not manage or take over the corporate debtor.
Section 58F	Management and Cooperation	Management of the corporate debtor vests with its Board/partners throughout the process. RP attends meetings and has veto power over resolutions. Promoters/personnel are liable for false information in the IM.	Unlike CIRP (where the IRP/RP takes over management), management continuity is the default. RP's veto right is a novel mechanism not found in CIRP, PPIRP, or fast-track CIRP.
Section 58G	Moratorium (Optional)	RP may apply to NCLT for a moratorium (section 14 scope) after CoC approval. Moratorium is not automatic — it commences from the date of application and requires NCLT confirmation.	In CIRP, moratorium is automatic and mandatory from insolvency commencement date. In CIRP-CI, it is discretionary, court-confirmed, and applied only when commercially warranted.
Section 58H	Conversion to CIRP	Mandates conversion to CIRP if: no resolution plan received, corporate debtor's non-cooperation, or plan rejection. CoC may also voluntarily convert by 66% vote.	Conversion — not liquidation — is the escalation step from CIRP-CI. This preserves the insolvency resolution opportunity and avoids premature liquidation.
Section 58-I	Withdrawal of Process	Allows withdrawal of the public announcement (closing CIRP-CI) on 90% CoC approval and NCLT sanction. Cannot withdraw before CoC constitution or after first invitation for resolution plans.	Withdrawal window is more restricted temporally compared to section 12A for CIRP — specifically prohibiting post-invitation withdrawal reinforces timeline discipline.
Section 58J	Approval of Resolution Plan	CoC approves plan by 66% vote; RP submits to NCLT with compliance report. NCLT applies section 31 (CIRP approval framework) mutatis mutandis, with limited jurisdiction to verify procedural compliance.	Unlike CIRP, the RP submits a separate compliance report alongside the plan confirming procedural regularity — a check absent in CIRP that reflects CIRP-CI's out-of-court nature.
Section 58K	Application of Part II Provisions	Sections 21, 24, 25A, 26, 27, 28, 28A, 29, 32, 32A, 43–51, Chapters VI and VII apply mutatis mutandis with defined terminology substitutions. Look-back periods for avoidance transactions measured from CIRP-CI commencement date.	Avoidance transaction provisions (sections 43–51) are expressly applied with modified look-back periods keyed to the CIRP-CI commencement date — preventing circumvention of look-back window.

VI. Gaps and Overall Observations

1. Withdrawal Timeline Discrepancy (sections 58-I(3) vs. 12A): Section 58-I(3) requires the NCLT to pass the withdrawal order within 14 days. Section 12A (as substituted by Clause 8) provides 30 days. The Bill does not explain this difference. Practitioners should note that the tighter 14-day window applies to CIRP-CI withdrawals.

2. Look-Back Period Modification (section 58K(1)(d)): The substitution of the look-back anchor from "initiation date" to "creditor-initiated insolvency commencement date" in sections 43, 46, and 50 (as modified for CIRP-CI by section 58K(1)(d)) is a material change that is easy to miss. Combined with the fact that the CIRP-CI commences without NCLT oversight, this modification is essential to ensure that avoidance transaction coverage is not diluted.

3. Delegation Intensity: Nearly all operational details — eligibility categories, notified financial institutions, conditions for initiation, form and manner of compliance reports, RP's right to reject resolutions, moratorium procedure, and procedural requirements — are delegated to Central Government rules or IBBI regulations. This means that the CIRP-CI cannot be operationalised until substantial subsidiary legislation is issued. Practitioners should monitor notifications under sections 58A(1), 58B(1), and 58B(2) in particular.

4. No Express Provision for RP Replacement during CIRP-CI: Unlike section 34A (inserted by Clause 22) which allows CoC to replace the liquidator during liquidation, Chapter IV-A does not contain an express provision for replacement of the RP during the CIRP-CI period. Section 58K applies sections 21 and 27 (RP replacement during CIRP) mutatis mutandis — so replacement may be possible under section 27 as applied, but the mechanism is implicit rather than explicit.

VII. Conclusion

Clause 40 proposes the most structurally ambitious single insertion in the Bill. By substituting eleven entirely new provisions (sections 58A to 58K) for the defunct Fast Track CIRP, it creates a new insolvency process track for India — one that prioritises speed, management continuity, and creditor consensus over judicial oversight at the initiation stage.

All cross-references within the new provisions have been verified against the Bill text and are accurate. Two items — the 14-day NCLT timeline under section 58-I(3) (shorter than section 12A's 30 days) and the look-back period modification under section 58K(1)(d) — merit specific attention in practice. No substantive drafting errors or dangling references were identified.

The efficacy of the CIRP-CI will depend heavily on the subsidiary legislation to be issued under the new provisions, particularly the categories of eligible corporate debtors and financial institutions to be notified. Until such notifications are issued, the provisions will remain dormant.

AI Assisted

Search This Blog

A.Sinha & Associates, Advocates

New Chapter on CIRP-CI : Creditor Initiated - As per the IBC Amendment Bill, 2025