UK Supreme Court declines to recognise Machine as Inventor of Patent

The UK Supreme Court has held that for the purposes of the UK Patents Act, 1977 patent rights can be conferred only to a “natural person” and not to any machine as in the present case which is claimed to be the inventor by the name of “DABUS” acting autonomously and powered by Artificial Intelligence. Case : Thaler (Appellant) - vs - Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks (Respondent) Coram : Lord Hodge Lord Kitchin Lord Hamblen Lord Leggatt Lord Richards Brief Facts : Dr Stephen Thaler filed two applications in October and November of 2018 (“The Applications”) to grant patents for what he claimed were inventions for “new and useful devices and methods”. The applications were filed under the 1977 Act (“The Patents Act”) and the grant forms (“The Grant Forms”) were attached to them. Dr Thaler stated that he was not an inventor and that he was the owner of a machine named DABUS (“DABUS”) which acted a...